Talk:Brüel & Kjær

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Riordanmr in topic Past vs. present tense

About this article edit

Copyright: You must formally send the license to Wikipedia according to WP:COPYRIGHT or our Business FAQ . You must give us more than permission to use it, you must release it under a GFDL license, as explained there. DGG (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article draws on 'A Brüel & Kjær History Lesson - Short Version' by Svend Gade, published in Sound and Vibration, August 2008. Permission to use information from article has been granted by the author.

granted: [Ticket#2009012710014069]

Parts of "Organisational developments" do not make sense edit

How can Brüel & Kjær acquire LDS Test & Measurement in January 2009 if they were split up in 1992?

Shouldn't it read "Brüel & Kjær Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S" instead of just "Brüel & Kjær"?

--Mortense (talk) 00:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Past vs. present tense edit

The opening paragraph reads "Brüel & Kjær (Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S) was a Danish multinational engineering and electronics company ... Brüel & Kjær is a subsidiary of Spectris."

This paragraph is inconsistent as to whether Brüel & Kjær still exists.

It seems that Brüel & Kjær was renamed to Hottinger Brüel & Kjær in 2020, but this information is buried near the end of the article, and is contradicted by the very next sentence, which uses the name Brüel & Kjær for an event that occurred in 2021.

I feel that the article should be updated regarding the renaming of the company and its existence. But I'm reluctant to do it myself, as I have no relevant information or references other than those already in the article. Riordanmr (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.aerospace-technology.com/contractors/noise_shock/brel-kjr/
    Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Brüel & Kjær. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply