Talk:Boulogne agreement

Boulogne agreement has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 30, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boulogne agreement/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Initial Comments edit

This appears to be a well-referenced article at or about GA-standard. I will therefore carry out a more detailed review against WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec (talk) 19:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Document and interpretation -

A minor comment: "Escrites a Boloigne le darrein jour de Janver l'an de Grace MCCC et septisme". I was unaware until now that I could partially read Anglo-Norman: but does not 'de Grace MCCC et Septisme' mean "1300 & 7 = 1307 AD"? Pyrotec (talk) 07:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I never even noticed this, thanks for pointing it out! It was definitely 1308, yet the source uses the word "septisme", which means "seventh". I believe this is because they are talking about the legal year, which started on 25 March, so while the Christian year was 1308, the legal year was still 1307. I'll just relegate the whole thing to a footnote, to avoid confusion. Lampman (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A well-referenced article

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 07:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic