Talk:Black & Decker DustBuster

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

uh

This article is totally nuts. What the heck. --24.0.40.252 (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Some person(s) who may have been personally involved with the creation of this type of vacuum, perhaps due to misunderstanding added a bunch of information that might have fit better on some kind of blog, and then it was reverted. They could have mentioned or recommended sources or patents to link to on the article's talk page instead. Whitebox (talk) 00:32, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

It seems to have been the result of some dispute. But Wikipedia is not the place for this kind of argument. Hohenloh ⁺ 23:32, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Black & Decker DustBuster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130908050544/http://www.idsa.org/dustbuster-1979 to http://www.idsa.org/dustbuster-1979
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222082112/http://www.blackanddecker.com/ProductGuide/CategoryOverview.aspx?cPath=1499.2210 to http://www.blackanddecker.com/ProductGuide/CategoryOverview.aspx?cPath=1499.2210

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)