Talk:Bills.com

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Business model? edit

bill.com sounds like a really nice company, what with all that helping the consumer, but how do they make money? Some hard facts would improve this article. I found a site that says "The firm makes money by taking a share of the savings it achieves for its clients", but certainly there is more to it than that. Would someone please explain where their profits come from? --CliffC (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

A Reply from Bills.com edit

Bills.com makes money by matching site visitors with service providers who have solutions to help their visitor’s specific needs. If, for example, the visitor is researching mortgage information on the Bills.com site, they can quickly access an inquiry form (called a “Savings Request”) which they submit to Bills.com, and in return, Bills.com matches the applicant with mortgage lenders and brokers that can help the applicant’s specific situation. The applicant is not charged for this service, so Bills.com makes money when the service provider (mortgage lender or broker) pays Bills.com for the applicant’s savings request. This becomes a lead for the service provider. Bills.com provides this matching service in multiple verticals, including: debt settlement, tax relief, mortgage, auto loans, insurance and student loans. -- Ethan Ewing, President, Bills.com

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bills.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bills.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply