This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The first paragraph of the criticism/controversies section uses a primary source of an organization that has next to no recognition and also no authority in the country. At least a secondary source should be used here. See WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. The rest of the section looks like original research. For example using this for claims of promoting Russian irredentism (in Wikivoice!), which is literally based on a photo which mentions "Holy Rus". Also due to WP:CSECTION, such a section should generally be avoided but this just looks like a POV edit. Mellk (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
