Talk:Battle of Uhud

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 142.247.225.221 in topic wrong content
Good articleBattle of Uhud has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 18, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Infobox seems to be broken. edit

I was browsing and the infobox is not working properly, I tried to fix it but I lack the know how.


Background edit

The background section uncritically asserts that Mohammed received divine revelation, without attributing the idea to Muslim belief or religious text. This is an article about an actual historical event; it should be rewritten to better clarify for readers what is religious belief and what is verifiable historical fact. 68.96.85.166 (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Another example: "and with great charisma and powers of suggestion"
This sort of gratuitous and unsupported praise doesn't belong in a fact-based article. 68.96.85.166 (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

wrong content edit

it is seen that in multiple pages it is written as prophet Mohammed plundered the caravans of quraish which is absolutely true.he strongly forbid plundering, robbing . enemy caravans were checked as a means of defense but robbing or plundering was strictly forbidden people believe Wikipedia blindly ,they don't check who edited it, I also never used to until I saw this absolute false story I request Wikipedia to allow editing of topics only by scholars of the topic. If you are not sure of this read islamic history from credible sources and kindly avoid misleading others from a religion that teaches of the smallest to biggest mistakes and forbids them 142.247.225.221 (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply