Talk:Batman Returns (video games)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by KGRAMR in topic Split the Article

Split the Article edit

The different "versions" of this game should be split into different articles because they are entirely different games with the same name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.36.120 (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Eight years late but I'd be willing to split them when I get some free time, but they may be stubs.....Spilia4 (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I came here to express similar sentiments. The Lynx version is already split out. There's no reason to lump the others together as well. oknazevad (talk) 15:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I also agree to separate the SNES, Genesis/Sega CD, Master System/Game Gear, Amiga, NES and DOS versions into their own articles... Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
In support of this motion, I propose the titles Batman Returns (SNES video game), Batman Returns (16-bit Sega video game), Batman Returns (8-bit Sega video game), Batman Returns (Amiga video game), Batman Returns (NES video game), and Batman Returns (DOS video game). Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Um, wow. But also strong support as they are clearly different games. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 08:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. If they are different games they are different subjects. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, looks like there was a confusion during the creation of the article. Merko (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - they are different games. That's all i have to say outside of my comment above. Roberth Martinez (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Batman Returns (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply