Talk:Bara (drum)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Summary removalsEdit

Kindly use "Discussion" to propose such removals. The removals of references does not enhance our article, which is growing by the minute. Let's work together to make this the best article possible on the Internet, or anywhere else, about this subject. Let's start by restoring the references. Thank you very much for this consideration, Badagnani (talk) 07:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And againEdit

Kindly refrain from removing references summarily; it does not enhance articles for our users, who must be foremost in our minds with each edit we make. Badagnani (talk) 07:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You misunderstand, references are not being removed but are actually being converted to footnotes per WP:CITE and WP:FOOTNOTES. Please do not cite sources by adding inline external links but use the {{cite}} tag instead. Multiple references to the same source should be done via a named reference for easy readability in the references section.--RadioFan (talk) 07:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, a number of references (diffs presented above) were clearly removed from the article, and remain removed. Kindly restore those, thank you again. Badagnani (talk) 07:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

of the 2 links you mention above, photo was moved to the external links section where readers are more likely to be looking for it and [1] is link to a site selling this musicians albums which doesn't provide a reference here. --RadioFan (talk) 07:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, a number of references (more than two) were removed, and remain removed, summarily and without consensus. Kindly restore them. Badagnani (talk) 07:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've got to be more specific than that. Are you referring to those that were replaced with named references?--RadioFan (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I provided diffs just above for references you removed, then refused to replace. Please replace them. The fact that you're asking, again and again, which references you removed indicates that you didn't read the comments on this page carefully. Badagnani (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PhotoEdit

If a photo which meets Wikipedia's image use policies exists, it would be a nice addition to this article.--RadioFan (talk) 07:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bara (drum). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]