Talk:Béla II of Hungary

Béla II of Hungary has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 17, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2014.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that an account in the Illuminated Chronicle holds that King Coloman of Hungary (pictured) ordered the castration of his nephew, the future Béla II, but the soldier assigned the task brought him dog testicles instead?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 13, 2022, and February 13, 2023.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Béla II of Hungary is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary High‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Álmos' exile edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If it would have happened in 1127, Stephen II should have been demand the extradition of Álmos from the emperor, compromise and make peace with the northern and western neighbors (Venice, Bohemia, Austria, Rus) and attack the Byzantine Empire within few months. Furthermore Álmos died in September 1127. I find this rapidity is inconceivable due to the contemporary transport, diplomacy etc. --Norden1990 (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Béla II of Hungary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 01:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~Article contains a ^[which?] tag in "Early years until 1131"~~
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3]
I fixed the tagging issues myself.
Overall: Other than ~~these few minor image issues and~~ the ^[which?] tag, the article is good to go.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Issue addressed, it is good to go! Nice job, Borsoka!

3family6, I found and added the relevant information. Thank you for your patience. Borsoka (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pass/Fail:

Add topic

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions