Talk:Award of Garden Merit

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability edit

I was surprised to see that one user has put a notability tag on this article, apparently with the idea that it could be merged with the RHS main article. I consider that it is better left as it is, since the general approach to the RHS article is to outline the Society and include references to other main articles such as the gardens and shows which users may look up by name. The main article would be unbalanced if all these items were merged, and the difficulty of searching would be a problem. I guess the user who inserted the tag is in fact aware that the AGM is very sort-after by suppliers - you only have to look at the huge lists of suppliers on the trials field to see that. It is worth a lot of money, no doubt, to those suppliers. I will remove the tag, and trust that others agree with me. Patche99z (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely – I couldn't agree more! There are far too many articles that try to encompass every facet of a subject on one page, which is admirable in its own way, but can be extremely off-putting if you just want to find out about one aspect and have to wade through hundreds and hundreds of lines to find it, or to piece together the relevant facts.SiGarb | Talk 18:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Award of Garden Merit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply