Talk:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

case article edit

Weirdly, we had (a) an article on Google Booksearch, with a significantly long section on this case, and (b) a separate breakout article on the settlement agreement (since rejected, twice). It makes much more sense to consolidate all the information from this particular legal case in one article, summarized and referenced appropriately in the Google BookSearch article. --Lquilter (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Revert of edit merging paragraphs edit

This was a well meaning, good faith edit to merge the paragraphs. But it falsifies or misleads as to the text of the opinion, where these points were set out separately. The court did not combine the points. See text of opinion. PraeceptorIP (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply