'...and is one of the oldest established airlines in Britain except for Loganair and Monarch Airlines. ' edit

What does this mean? It is the oldest after Loganair and Monarch Airlines? Or it is one of the oldest (Loganiar and Monarch Airlines being older). Is this sentence illogical or am I just a bit tap? 86.165.130.244 (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 September 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply



Aurigny Air ServicesAurigny – The airline nearly always referred to as Aurigny, and very rarely referred to by its full name. Their official website is aurigny.com, and all their livery displays only the word 'Aurigny'. It is their brand identity, and to use it as the title of the article is unnecessary. It is akin to Lufthansa not being entitled Deutsche Lufthansa AG. TheKaphox (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agree, it makes a lot of sense. Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Not often in English, people in the Channel Islands tend to know what "Aurigny" means but rarely use it to mean the island. However it is the French name for Alderney Aurigny Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Agree, per common name - in English it us unlikely to be a reference to the island rather than the airline. MilborneOne (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Agree, makes sense. I also agree that using the short form is consistent with the title format of other airline articles (e.g. Quantas, Vueling), if doing so doesn't create an ambiguity with another article. Carbonix (talk) 13:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aurigny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aurigny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Former fleet development with retirement reasons and dates? edit

Can you tell me the former fleet development with retirement reasons and dates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talkcontribs) 05:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply