Talk:Augustus De Morgan

Augustus De Morgan

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenasdiaz (talk • contribs) 18:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello. From searching the web for some of the text of the current version of this article, it looks like it is copied entirely from "Ten British Mathematicians of the 19th Century", by Alexander Macfarlane, dated 1916, at: http://www.gutenberg.net/etext06/tbmms10p.pdf (Project Gutenberg). That's great, no problem with copyright. The only thing I want to suggest here is that when source texts such as this are imported, it would be a good idea to put a note in the article or the talk page telling where it came from. Texts copied from other sources are an ongoing problem for Wikipedia -- let's make it easier to find the problematic articles by clearly labeling the ones that aren't a problem. Happy editing, Wile E. Heresiarch 05:53, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

Mathematical induction was first used by Francesco Maurolico in 1575 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Maurolico) and completely understood by Pascal. The intro paragraph should be changed accordingly.Scorwin (talk) 21:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

---

whichever ancient work it was copied from, the style is dreadful. totally inappropriate for a modern encyclopedia and not likely to enlighten many people about the mathematics it pretends to explain. hopefully someone will scrap the lot and write something from scratch.

---

Is it "de Morgan" or "De Morgan"? I've seen both used. What language uses "De" in names? Is capitalizing "De" the usual convention in it? Kaol 22:08, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

I'm guessing "de", latin/french for "of". Speaking of latin, could somebody please translate this?

He once printed his name: Augustus De Morgan, H - O - M - O - P - A - U - C - A - R - U - M - L - I - T - E - R - A - R - U - M.

I'm sure that's something very humorous in Latin, but, unfortunately, I only understand English... (man of few words perhaps?)

crazyeddie 06:06, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

It means "Man of few letters." They were going to confer on him the degree Doctor of Letters. --Polylerus 23:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

The word "de" means "of" in all major romance languages (in Italian, it's "di"). "de" in most French names is in lower case unless it starts a sentence. Correct me if I'm wrong. ~elviajero (talk · contribs)

The "de" or "De" discussion

Fellow fans of Augustus De Morgan,

"de" is the Dutch language article corresponding to the English article "the". Many Dutch and Belgian surnames use that article, such as "De Wolf" (the wolf) or "Van de Velden" (from Velden). My speculation is that De Morgan's surname is of Dutch origin, since "from Morgan" does not make sense to me at all. In that case, it is customary but not necessary for the surname to start with a higher-case "D" (that goes for many other languages, e.g. I have a friend whose surname is "de Oliveira" and another whose surname is "De Rossi").

By the way, was I the only one to notice many parts of this article on De Morgan were copied from The MacTutor article?

Porcher 04:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

If you read the first comment in this Talk, you will see that they were both copied from the same source.Billlion 22:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

De Morgan doesn't seem Dutch to me, except if it were derived from De Morgen ("the morning"), though I can't find that name in the phonebook or on genealogy sites.
Qwertyus 15:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

There are a number of Irish names that come from Latin through Norman French, De Leon is one, Delaney from De l’aunaie is another. For some reason they are generally written with a capital "De" as in De Morgan. It's a bit strange, though, since Morgan is a Celtic name.
Billlion (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC) (Bill "De Leon")

Since English is not my mother tongue I cannot say that this is this way for sure, but in Spanish the article is "de" and we write "Augustus de Morgan" and (if we want to say just the surname) "De Morgan". This is a Spanish grammar general rule: When the surname has a particle such as "de" and we want to refer to that person just by saying his/her surname, we put "De".
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.63.211 (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Since English is not your mother tongue, please leave the entire subject alone! Britain is the location of immigrants from many, many places.
23:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

It really is Augustus De Morgan; his handwritten name can be seen here: http://www.owenandbarlow.com/pd_augustus_de_morgan_1806-1871_autograph_letter_signed.cfm, and http://www.unav.es/gep/DeMorgan14.04.68G3.html. VWA (talk) 21:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

music

In what sense is this guy a 'British Music Theorist...? It seems to me that the 'category' is quite undeserved...
Pfistermeister (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Removed it. Billlion (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Should

De Morgan became blind in one eye a month or two after he was born. This is referred to in the article, but only vaguely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.34.71 (talk) 12:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC) See http://www.engr.iupui.edu/~orr/webpages/cpt120/mathbios/ademo.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.170.8 (talk) 10:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Budget of Paradoxes

Now available at Wikisource. Regards, Paradoctor (talk) 23:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

The long quoted section including "met at Indianapolis in 1890" cannot be by De Morgan, who died in 1871. It might have been inserted by the editor of the second edition (1915), David Eugene Smith, but I have just scanned my copy of that edition and found no such thing. Hardly any of Smith's footnotes are anywhere near as long as this quote. Do not attribute this quote to De Morgan. StarryEye (talk) 04:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Budget Of Paradoxes has been available at Project Gutenberg for years. (Budget Of Paradoxes) Hpfeil (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Sleeping

One of my college professors told me years ago the man was famous also for sleeping 22 hours a day for the last 20 years of his life. I have to wonder if anyone knows if this is true. Jokem (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Very doubtful. It is true that as the French mathematican Gaspard Monge grew older and older, he slept more and more every day. Monge also kept records of his hours of sleep, and since he was an old mathematican, he kept tables of his records, and he drew graphs of his hours of sleep. No kidding. Monge predicted that whenever he started sleeping 24 hours a day, then he would be DEAD - natually. Monge extended his lines and he made predictions for when that would happen for his servants, and whatever members of his family were around. (Maybe he didn't have any.) In the end, Monge got to where he was sleeping 23 hours a day, and at that point, he was so sick that he did die at that time.
98.81.2.69 (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

book excerpts

I noticed the same thing as Buenasdiaz, only 8 years later. Large portions of this article are taken verbatim from the publicly available book "Ten British Mathematicians", found here: http://www.archive.org/stream/tenbritishmathem09942gut/tbmms10p_djvu.txt

I also feel that the original work should be credited. It is linked to under further reading, but it's unclear from the article that the text is directly derived from it.

141.214.17.4 (talk) 00:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)brendan

Cause of death?

The article currently states that De Morgan died of "nervous prostration" (mental breakdown).

Granted, health declines when the spirit breaks; but it's customary to give a physical diagnosis as the actual cause of death.

Karl gregory jones (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Augustus De Morgan - Claimed atheism as stated fact?

Adding individuals to atheism category may be in violation of several WP rules and guidelines

One source by parapsychologist John Beloff (president of the Parapsychological Association) Parapsychology: A Concise History (1993) is no enough for stating that someone has definite belief in this or that. Augustus De Morgan non-conforming disposition as been interpreted by one parapsychologist Beloff as meaning he was atheist? That will not just do.

Statements and claims presented as a fact must be backed by balanced, certified and strong unequivocal research and scholarship with the help of multiple sources. Loose claims here and there are just opinions and does not amount to an fair and balanced view. Varying authors can be be used as a source for presenting an opinion for such and such, but it is still not to be deemed authoritative and conclusive.

Multiple sources and scholarly consensus must be the main aim when something is stated as a reasonable fact. Otherwise we are deceiving.

PLEASE OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING

WP:BLPCAT - Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question

WP:CHERRY fact picking. Instead of finding a balanced set of information about the subject, a coatrack goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias. An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to be bold and trim off excessive biased content

WP:EXCEPTIONAL - Exceptional claims require exceptional sources

WP:SCICON The statement that all or most scientists, scholars, or ministers hold a certain view requires a reliable source. Without it, opinions should be identified as those of particular, named sources. Editors should avoid original research especially with regard to making blanket statements based on novel syntheses of disparate material.

WP:FRINGE -A theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article

WP:YESPOV Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view.

WP:WEIGHT -Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.

WP:YESPOV -Avoid stating opinions as facts

WP:NOR -Any analysis or interpretation of the quoted material, however, should rely on a secondary source (See: WP:No original research)

PS

These may be furthermore of use

WP:NOTOPINION -Opinion pieces, although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes".

WP:NOTRELIABLE - Questionable sources are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest.[8] Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely considered by other sources to be extremist or promotional

WP:ASSERT When a statement is a fact (a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute) it should be asserted without prefixing it with "(Source) says that ...", and when a statement is an opinion (a matter which is subject to dispute) it should be attributed to the source that offered the opinion using inline-text attribution.

WP:SYN :Synthesis of published material that advances a position. Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.

Thank you and hope to make Wikipedia a better place!

Pgarret (talk) 10:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

De Morgan was definitely not an atheist; he was fiercely anti-dogma. De Morgan's wife Sophia was very clear in her Memoir of Augustus De Morgan, pp. 366-368, and in the last sentence, on p. 368, she gave his reasons not to be publicly open in his beliefs: "The state of mind in which he had lived, and in which he died, is shown by a sentence in his will: "I commend my future with hope and confidence to Almighty God; to God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, whom I believe in my heart to be the Son of God, but whom I have not confessed with my lips, because in my time such confession has always been the way up in the world."" VWA (talk) 13:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Augustus De Morgan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://archives.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&database=ChoiceArchive&search=IN=MS913A
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111053034/http://www.shl.lon.ac.uk:80/specialcollections/demorgan.shtml to http://www.shl.lon.ac.uk/specialcollections/demorgan.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Update needed

Much of the article seems to have been lifted from some antique encyclopedia, maybe the 1911 EB. It reads in ye-olde-tea-shoppe style and is woefully underlinked, rambling, poorly explained and lamentably under-cited. A rewrite might be in order. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

It's definitely in order - it's not impartial at all, nor well sited. It's a shame since some of it is quite interesting, like the "paradoxer to whom De Morgan paid the compliment which Achilles paid Hector — to drag him round the walls again and again", which reads like a commentary, but for that reason should be replaced. FinnberlyRobin (talk) 12:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)