Talk:Astronomical Observatory (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

WikiProject Astronomy

I submitted a request to WikiProject Astronomy for assistance on the techinical aspects, to ensure accuracy.A mcmurray 14:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

They added their banner but haven't inputted yet. Either way, it is not as if concerns have been raised about accuracy just would like to make sure. Article submitted for GA yesterday.A mcmurray 18:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

GA review

I have posted this article at GA review, comments will be left on the discussion section. IvoShandor 12:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

GA kept

The article was kept. See the article history for a link to the discussion. Quadzilla99 16:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Astronomical Observatory (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA Sweeps: Kept

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there is an issue that needs to be addressed. I have already made minor corrections to the article, but have included an issue below that I believe need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA.

1. In the lead, it mentions the observatory's addition as a National Register of Historic Places and U.S. National Historic Landmark. However, this is not mentioned in the article. The history ends at the 1960s for the architecture and its discoveries. The article needs expansion detailing its history in the 1970s-2000s plus mention the National Register of Historic Places/U.S. National Historic Landmark as described in the lead.

This article covers the topic well and if the above issue is addressed, I believe the article can remain a GA. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at WP:GAN. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

This was one of my first Good Articles. I'll see what I can do, the NRHP nom form and a few other sources may help. I'll check it out. I'll probably also reorganize the article a bit too. I may need a bit of time because I only have internet access at work for the time being.--IvoShandor (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

No worries, there's no big hurry. It looks like there are still a few more of your GAs left to review on the Sweeps list, so maybe you can take a look at the ones left and revisit those before they are reviewed. I think this is one of the first times I put one of your articles on hold, since usually they always meet the criteria. Anyway, let me know when you're done and I'll take a look. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I've already done a few things, added a little bit. I am going to try to get hold of the NHL nomination, because it's not online yet it may take some time (the NPS is slow, notoriously so), but it's ok if that means it will be delisted for the time being. I have a free weekend so I'll see what my tiny local library has to offer, and if it's a no-go there, I'll head over to my alma mater and investigate their massive amounts of texts and the whatnots and what have yous and such. My current sources don't seem to go beyond 1996 or so.--IvoShandor (talk) 07:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Let me know what you find. There's no reason to delist it with the current layout and recent additions, but I want to leave it on hold until your new additions are added. I think one of my longest holds was for over a month, so don't worry if you need a few weeks to get the details. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure I will be able to find any additional information. If you could take a look at the article and let me know if it's up to snuff that'd be great. If you have the time, and it's not up to the criteria, could you please let me know where it is still lacking. Thanks.--IvoShandor (talk) 04:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

If nothing more is available then the article meets the criteria. You addressed the issue I raised above and tried to find additional sources. You can always pursue this in the future, but as it stands now, I believe the article meets the criteria and should remain a GA. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Right on, well I trust your judgment on this stuff. I will continue the search. The few materials I could find (but don't yet have access to) aren't that promising as far as new information, they were all published before 1974.--IvoShandor (talk) 05:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, just keep an eye out. Something may turn up as some newspaper/magazine randomly writes an article on it, perhaps for some anniversary. Hopefully they don't use Wikipedia for their research for the article though or you may not have too much to go off of! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

File:12inchUIobsy.jpeg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:12inchUIobsy.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:12inchUIobsy.jpeg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Astronomical Observatory (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605220126/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2091&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2091&ResourceType=Building
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605220126/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2091&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2091&ResourceType=Building
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060905144746/http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~uias/observatour.html to http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~uias/observatour.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015145200/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky5/astro4h.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky5/astro4h.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901083648/http://www.phys-astro.sonoma.edu/people/faculty/tenn/RiseAndFall/Rise1.html to http://www.phys-astro.sonoma.edu/people/faculty/tenn/RiseAndFall/Rise1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Astronomical Observatory (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Issues unaddressed; delisting. Hog Farm _Talk 16:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Quite significant unsourced text, especially in the history section. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.