Talk:Asparagus racemosus

Medical claims

All medical claims MUST be supported by sources which meet the requirements of WP:MEDRS. Please read this carefully before adding any claims about the medical benefits of this species. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I can only agree with that, though in the field of esotericism, some may not agree with this concept. Take for example the fourth source, a review written for the "Asian Pacific Journal for Tropical Disease", where a relatively large portion of the introduction was copied from this very article. Is this a showcase for adherence to scientific guidelines? Most health benefits listed in the review also do not seem to have been empirically tested on humans, nevertheless are they insinuated as health benefits for humans in this article. --lmaxmai (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Asparagus racemosus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120425132550/http://www.researchgrantdatabase.com/g/1F32CA091635-01/Total-Synthesis-of-the-Antitumor-Agent-Asparagamine-A/ to http://www.researchgrantdatabase.com/g/1F32CA091635-01/Total-Synthesis-of-the-Antitumor-Agent-Asparagamine-A/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asparagus racemosus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120525200654/http://leygroup.ch.cam.ac.uk/lab_letters/PDF/asparagamine.pdf to http://leygroup.ch.cam.ac.uk/lab_letters/PDF/asparagamine.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101001013838/http://www.toddcaldecott.com:80/index.php/herbs/learning-herbs/331-shatavari to http://www.toddcaldecott.com/index.php/herbs/learning-herbs/331-shatavari

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)