Talk:Asbestos and the law (United States)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asbestos and the law (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110111103453/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2005/05/senate-judiciary-committee-wants.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2005/05/senate-judiciary-committee-wants.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.btinternet.com/~ibas/lka_us_congress.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151118164001/http://www.cagc.org/advocacy/openwba/legis_update_012115.cfm to http://www.cagc.org/advocacy/openwba/legis_update_012115.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Large scale, unexplained reversion

A reversion that results in large scale, unexplained, disruptive changes should be explained and discussed in advance. 2601:401:503:62B0:656D:CAA7:3AB4:D12A (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Merger / redirect proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to proceed with the merger.

---

The U.S.-focused orphan articles, Types of fraud in asbestos claims and RICO suits in asbestos litigation (United States) are redundant of Asbestos and the law (United_States) and do not appear to be justifiable as a stand-alone articles. The fraud article seems adequately replaced with a redirect to Asbestos and the law (United_States)#Common defenses. Arllaw (talk) 03:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Another possible candidate for merger, Asbestos bankruptcy trusts. Arllaw (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

The article Types of fraud in asbestos claims was removed for reasons unrelated to this merger proposal. I have added a redirect as described above.Arllaw (talk) 18:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

As the reasons that this merger might have been contentious appear resolved by the sockpuppet investigation, and as I anticipate no discussion or objection, I proceeded with the merger.Arllaw (talk) 20:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Undisclosed paid editing

I have added an {{undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Classyklowngrasper for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Classyklowngrasper (talk · contribs), Wootwootmaster1776 (talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring notability, due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)