Talk:Turritis glabra

(Redirected from Talk:Arabis glabra)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by MtBotany in topic Possible move to Turritis

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arabis glabra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arabis glabra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Link to german page edit

The plant is in the german wikipedia as de:Turmkraut, but I don't know how to work in wikidata. Ralf Muschall (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ralf Muschall I'm not 100% sure, but I think it will link when/if the page is moved to Turritis glabra because of the way Turmkraut is linked to Wikidata using that species name. Edit: Und, auch "Hallo". Ich kann ein wenig Deutsch lesen. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ralf Muschall And it turns out I was right about this. The pages are now linked after the move. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Possible move to Turritis edit

I noticed that this species and two others are classified in the genus Turritis by Plants of the World Online(1) and World Flora Online(2). In addition NatureServe now uses this as the correct species name as Turritis glabra. Is there any compelling reason not to move it? The other two species are currently red links so no need to move them. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it should be changed to Turritis (for now!). E Wusk (talk) 10:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@E Wusk I made the request for the move and edited the page with a (very basic) description of the taxonomic disagreement in a new Taxonomy section. I'm not sure I got it all correct so I'm going to have to do some research to see what papers I can find. Surprisingly fun one to research as I'm learning interesting things about some botanists in addition to finally realizing what that plant that comes up in my garden is. Glad I left it alone as too interesting looking to eradicate. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, I'm envious of that, MtBotany. It is a native plant around here but extinct and I've never seen it. E Wusk (talk) 10:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think it is the tendency towards having alkaline soils that make it moderately common here in Colorado. It is also fairly common other western US states. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 17:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]