This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why isn't the US mentioned in here, at least in disambiguation? Appropriation refers to the US and links here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.228.109.44 (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
References in Current Law Statutes to the Act 27 & 28 Vict c 73 as the Supply Act 1864 might be erroneous. Bateman says that Appropriation Acts are not Supply Acts: see the book "Public Finance and Parliamentary Constitutionalism". So I have not included that name in the entry for that Act. James500 (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
