Talk:Angelica

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Angelica stricta

Anybody know anything about this species? 78.151.106.245 (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Also perhaps Angelica lignescens could be added. 78.151.106.245 (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject

I need help with my essential oil wikiproject please. Wikipedia:WikiProject Essential Oils Ilikeguys21 (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angelica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170525105020/http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf to http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Sidebar taxonomy

The current sidebar lists the taxonomy as "Kingdom, Clade, Clade, Clade..." Is this an error? Saxshoe (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Abortifacient?

Apparently, it's been "known to be an effective abortifacient in the early stages of pregnancy for thousands of years." See https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/05/ben-franklin-american-instructor-textbook-abortion-recipe.html. This fact should be incorporated into the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.152.234 (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Reverted, forgot Edit summary

I just reverted this article to two versions ago. And then I forgot to add an edit summary, just when it's arguably most important to do it. An IP User--the same one--had made two edits; if they were indeed good faith edits, they still made no sense. Uporządnicki (talk) 12:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)