Talk:Amravati district

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Amravati district


Dr. Abasaheb@ Gopalrao Khedkar edit

What does '@' mean in a person's name? Varlaam (talk) 08:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Amravati district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gazetteers edit

@YBG: In this edit I changed the spelling of "Gazetteer" in two references. Both references have working URLs leading to pages that spell the word with double-T. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:01, 6 Janary 2017 (UTC)

Great! Sorry to have reverted you. Your edit summary made it seem like it might have been a change just because of a spell checker complaint. Having checked the link (which I should have done before) I have reverted my revert. Thanks for your understanding! YBG (talk) 07:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for checking. I'm sorry my edit summary didn't give any detail - I usually remember to leave a better edit summary than that. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amravati district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Amravati district edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Amravati district's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "langs":

  • From Gondia district: "C-16 Population By Mother Tongue – Maharashtra". censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  • From Nanded district: 2011 Census of India, Population By Mother Tongue
  • From Osmanabad district: 2011 Census of India, Population By Mother Tongue
  • From Buldhana district: "Census of India: C-16 Population By Mother Tongue". Census of India Website. Retrieved 10 October 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply