Talk:Ammonium lauryl sulfate

US vs Europe

It is most widely used in the United States. In Europe sodium laureth sulfate is used instead because ammonium lauryl sulfate gives off an ammonia odor when the pH is alkaline.

Strangely, the brand of "Head and Shoulders" I use has Ammonium lauryl sulfate here in Europe, and the one I bought in the US has Sodium lauryl sulfate.

Is the above sentence actually correct in most circumstances? Or should it be removed, with other products (but not all) being the opposite way round. Or is the sentence incorrect, and Europe and the US should be switched?

zoney ♣ talk 10:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

dubious statement

• Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate, aka Ammonium Dodecyl sulfate - any truth in that?
• is simply a cheaper form... - how simply?
• Contrary to the above... etc. - I don't understand the last bit.

The sentence needs more research, rephrasing or it should be simply deleted. -- drybittermelon (talk．contribs) 02:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Dodecyl and lauryl are equivalent. Take a look at sodium dodecyl sulfate --Rifleman 82 05:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Rewrite

Rewrote using heavily researched material. Changed erroneous image, previous image displayed a 10-member carbon chain instead of the 12-membered carbon chain associated with a dodecyl molecule. My writing is most likely quite choppy and could use some smoothing out but I hope I have provided the references necessary to make the article credible. AlexUF 00:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the repeated formatting changes, this is my first article.AlexUF

Huffing Shampoo

I removed a section that stated a new trend emerged in 2012 where people were boiling shampoo to get high. It linked to an unsourced blog with only 1 post. I could find nowhere else online a reference to this so-called trend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.54.112 (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ammonium lauryl sulfate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823055845/http://www.nicnas.gov.au/Publications/Information_Sheets/Existing_Chemical_Information_Sheets/ECIS_ALS_PDF.pdf to http://www.nicnas.gov.au/Publications/Information_Sheets/Existing_Chemical_Information_Sheets/ECIS_ALS_PDF.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327205021/http://www.cdc.gov/noes/noes4/m2632sco.html to http://www.cdc.gov/noes/noes4/m2632sco.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107201838/http://www.heraproject.com/files/3-E-04-HERA%20AS%20Env%20web%20wd.pdf to http://www.heraproject.com/files/3-E-04-HERA%20AS%20Env%20web%20wd.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)