This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is totally valid. It was moved out of process, without community consensus, to Draft space temporarily over an editor's objection to the fact that it linked to a number of disambiguation pages. That is not valid grounds for deletion/removal. I'm perfectly happy that the dab links got edited, but it still was not right to move it to Draft. An AFD would have been concluded Speedy Keep, is my best guess. Unilateral deletion/removal actions are against Wikipedia policy/practices/ethics, IMHO. --Doncram (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
