Talk:Alkarama

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Allegation of terrorism assocation edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since there will likely be occasional controversy over the inclusion of the terrorism allegation section, I will give the background (recopied) below.

Chronology of what happened: Al Naimi and Al Humaiqani were effectively declared terrorists by the US Treasury (the DoT makes the announcement because the allegation is financial), in response to which associated groups like Amnesty International said nothing. The national media followed with its own reporting, which was largely copy-pasted directly from the DoT press release, and many outlets directly associated Alkarama as part of a list of Muslim-terrorist-charity-front organizations.

I forget how I got interested in the story - I check out news on related issues fairly regularly, so I probably stumbled on some news story about this and got annoyed at the lack of detail. I dug around the background - financial info, old news outlets (Al Humaiqani was named exactly once in all the news archived ever by or about Alkarama) - and it pretty much confirmed that the allegation of financing terrorist activities would be painfully circumstantial. Even if it weren't, Al Humaiqani has had almost no association with Alkarama's operations since its founding, and Al Naimi's accusation is based almost exclusively on his association with Al Humaiqani. That said, the counterpoint that this was a retaliation for criticizing U.S. policy doesn't make much sense to me - it seems much more likely to be an indirect political attack/maneuver against Al Naimi or Yemen or something.

Anyway, the next step was to put these findings into the article, which resulted in the section you see. I studied journalism and try to write objective content while making my assessment clear enough, but if that's not the case here, feel free to edit.

But the fact remains that the entire US news media reported on this between the initial DoT press release, Al Naimi's response, Amnesty's lack of response, and Al Naimi's resignation. These articles are permanently archived on all the various blogs, so when somebody googles "Alkarama", they will see articles with big headlines like "Terrorists For Human Rights" (DailyKos). Almost no blogs or news outlets did the research to at least get some assessment of the claims (otherwise I would have had way less work to do). The accusation and its damage are permanently archived online, so this WP article does its job for clarifying the truth of the matter for those curious about the organization by keeping this section. (orig. 21:47, 18 July 2014 (UTC)) SamuelRiv (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alkarama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160410034243/http://en.alkarama.org/our-people to http://en.alkarama.org/our-people
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140326134700/http://en.alkarama.org/about-us to http://en.alkarama.org/about-us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic