Talk:Algeria at the 2010 Winter Olympics

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Algeria at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Same British Columbia comment Same WP:CANPLACE comment ;) Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Oops. Ignore all my mentions of this. Avoid repetitive 2006s in 2006 for the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin, Italy. Rewritten Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) I think you a word Although Algeria was won medals No? They won medals in the Summer Games as early as Los Angeles '84? Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Did you mean has though? Although Algeria has won medals. Oops... Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Did you mean ever? athlete has even won Right Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Heh, :P Te nation Fixed already Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Use the word cross-country somewhere here the 15 kilometre freestyle. Done. Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Clunky, try rewording His time was good for 84th place out of 95 competitiors who finished the race. Done. Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Does the website in the infobox work for you? Nope, removed. Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	I looked for other sources but only found what I believe are blogs.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	There is not too much detail
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Pending
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	There is the cropped image of him on his page (and a similarly cropped one on Commons), but I think they serve better on those pages than here.
	7. Overall assessment.

• Responses inline, Kees08! Courcelles (talk) 11:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)