Talk:Alexander Bain (inventor)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SandyGeorgia in topic Copyright problem removed
Former good articleAlexander Bain (inventor) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Potassium ferrocyanide or ferricyanide? edit

The Pantelegraph article states that it used paper impregnated with potassium ferricyanide, while this article mentions potassium ferrocyanide, a different chemical with a very similar-sounding name. Is there a written source on which chemical Bain actually used? Discoverator (talk) 09:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment edit

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stopping there; the usual smorgasbord of copyvio, paraphrasing issues, changed meaning, failed verification, not to mention later removing the WP:ENGVAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk)

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Various, see talk. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply