Talk:Aldenham
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Adam37 in topic And it is unspoilt, alas true. but keep opinions down
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aldenham article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
And it is unspoilt, alas true. but keep opinions down edit
To spare the article any more of this:
 | This section contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (August 2012) |
Contributors do not add too much promotional language. I have been to Aldenham by cycling with friends it is unspoilt compared to the hubbub and density of the city of London, but not at all any more so than so much of rural Herts, wikipedia can allow secluded as fair comment but not to hook on and is unspoilt. So to summarise, unfortunately for the locals, proud to retain such inner green-belt breathing space, this offends the WP:Peacock rule so I am removing it unless we can say every English village needs to have the inherently old-hat unspoilt word that has not been ruined without risking getting too political? Adam37 (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)