A fact from Aichi F1A appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the pilot of the Aichi F1A sat in an open cockpit, while the observer's position was enclosed?
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:05, April 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
When using the long system or -shi systems the service the aircraft is intended for must be at the front or confusion could reign as there are more than a few similar designations only differentiated by the service.
Not:- Experimental 10-shi Observation Plane
But :- Navy Experimental 10-shi Observation Plane
as opposed to the (fictional): Army Experimental 10-shi Observation Plane
Petebutt (talk) 06:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
The -Shi designation system for prototypes was ONLY used by the IJN (according to Mikesh and Abe), not the Imperial Japanese Army so the addition of "Navy" is unnecessary in this case.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article really needs a photograph, preferably more than one (pontoon and wheeled arrangements).
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
