Talk:Aevum
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aevum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seeking Assistance edit
I am aware that this page, as it currently stands, is a fairly inadequate overview of the concept of aeviternity. It is intended simply as a means of getting the subject onto Wikipedia, so that people who have more expertise on the subject (and who possibly own their own copies of De quattuor coaequaevis) can come and flesh it out. If anybody reading this fits that description, please don't hesitate to come in and start rescuplting the page from the bottom up. -Agur bar Jacé (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- I would question the academic worth of an almost unknown publisher as a qualified academic historian. It implies OR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.9.109 (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
"Dates back at least back to Albert" is incorrect edit
It's MORE correct to say that the concept of aeviternity dates back at least to Boethius. Source: Aquinas, Summa Theogica (I, q.10, a.5). By the way, no valid source was cited for the original claim. The fact that a source talks about Albert and aeviternity doesn't mean the concept originated with Albert. 2601:840:8783:FE40:896:50F4:75EF:E54 (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)