This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I think this is the same person as Aphthonius of Antioch, the sophist; if so, the article on Aphthonius has more references and should probably be retained and the article on Aelius Festus Aphthonius deleted.--FeanorStar7 11:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
DoneKlbrain (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
@FeanorStar7:: I'm not trying to be combative, but do you have a citation to back up the claim that they are the same person? I say that because I can find no evidence online, but I'd be happy to be pointed to any published 20th-21st century scholarship. I came across this merge because the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica identified two separate people, Aphthonius the Greek grammarian, and Aphthonius, Aelius Festus, the Latin grammarian. Granted, they flourished at the same time, and it's remotely possible that the second is conflated with the 3rd century Sextus Pompeius Festus. But EB1911 does provide 19th-century citations to both articles. And back then, would it be likely that the same person is notable as both Greek and Latin grammarian (again, I have no idea)?
If there's no contrary evidence, I'm inclined to separate them out again based on EB1911, with a {{distinguish}} note. Also pinging Klbrain. David Brooks (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for point out those EB1911 articles, DavidBrooks; given this, I'd support separating them again unless there is some further evidence that they are the same person. Klbrain (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi: no problem. I don't have a lot of time to do the research and I may have misinterpreted the information in the articles. If one was Greek and the other Roman and there were separate 19th century citations for each, then yes, they should be distinguished. thanks for following up. FeanorStar7 23:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)