Talk:Adamsite

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adamsite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050729074635/http://www.nti.org:80/e_research/profiles/NK/Chemical/50_1074.html to http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/NK/Chemical/50_1074.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051017210921/http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/adamsite/casedef.asp to http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/adamsite/casedef.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adamsite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf to http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Portland Protests?

Last edit reverted mention of the claim that authorities were using adamsite on protestors. Reasoning was it was "unsubstantiated rumors online by non experts." I will agree we have no concrete proof. What we do know: 1: we have on video authorities using a can of "canary yellow gas that fades when exposed to oxygen" (link) 2: we have reports of vomiting on the street (link), but no video 3: we have second hand reports of the smell of chlorine (associated with old and decomposing DM) (link 1) (link 2) 4: from the looks of it, no one has collected canisters marked as DM (they say police are trying to be very cautious to not let any info get out) 5: CONFIRMED: the gas pdx is using is old reserve, a lot of which is decomposing (link) 6: analysis of the gas is/was ongoing (link)

Not sure if this is worthy of a fact-based edit, but a mention or further research seems necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.49.139.21 (talk) 17:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)