Talk:Adam Clarke

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Theology / Arminianism / Methodism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reference to Clarke being antisemitic is NPOV. I don't think there's a need to editorialize - keep the quote and let people draw their own conclusions. Adam_sk (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rosetta Stone edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I find the following sentence incomprehensible:

He also proposed that the third language was Coptic (it was actually Demotic, which is written almost the same as, and has the same meaning as Coptic)

Is Demotic really written "almost the same" as Coptic? And what does "to have the same meaning" signify? That the two words, Coptic and Demotic mean the same, or that the two languages are virtually indistinguishable? I do not have the expertise to edit the text, but whatever it is asserting does not correspond with what I can read about Demotic and Coptic in Wikipedia, or what I know about the Rosetta Stone.

I hope this is helpful. Robert Limb (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic