Talk:Achilleis (trilogy)

Aquila Theatre Company's "Wrath of Achilles"

This theatre company that specializes in Greek classical stuff produced the play a few years ago -- its based on Iliad 16-19. Does that warrant a mention here? Or would it belong on the Iliad page? Or both?Ifnkovhg 21:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

I did some cleanup on this. Shouldn't the title be changed?Ifnkovhg (talk) 03:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The move and the article

Just a note on why I moved this page from Achilles (play) to Achilleis (trilogy). This was, firstly, no single "play" called the Achilles, but, as the entry explains, Achilleis is the modern designation for a trilogy of plays. Since, when the scholarship refers to this trilogy by name it is invariably with Achilleis, this title is to be preferred. The source of the title Achilles appears to be a misunderstanding in the popular media, and one that we should not repeat here.

Another set of misunderstandings can be found in the buzz around the modern adaptation/envisioning that is given undue weight in this article. No new fragments from "mummies" were discovered toward the end of the 20th century—most of the fragments came out of the ground like a potato, scraps of ancient texts found in the rubbish heaps of Oxyrhynchus that were never made into cartonnage or "mummy stuffing". The statements in the article are a synthesis of an interesting fact about the discovery of some classical texts and the press release hype that attended the Cyprus production. In fact, most of the extant fragments had been published during the first half of the century. Someone at some point inserted this appropriately incredulous sentence: "The fragments purported to have been discovered have not even yet been reported in the academic press, which would be a remarkable omission." I hope to work on this in the near future (perhaps even later today), but I note these facts here in case someone knowledgeable in the topic notices my move and happens by. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 12:10, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I've trimmed down the bit about the Cyprus production, excising the erroneous info about the ancient text that really has nothing to do with that production, and updating the info about preformance. In the process I also removed some refs that derived from the same press release but added nothing other than misapprehensions that further muddy the water. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Achilleis (trilogy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330161701/http://www.thoc.org.cy/gr/archive/Production.aspx?ProductionID=314 to http://www.thoc.org.cy/gr/archive/Production.aspx?ProductionID=314

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)