Talk:Abrogans

---

The Acquaintance Algorithm

the first page of this codex taken from Abrogans. dheomodi. humilis: samftmoati. abba. faterlih: pater to dificilia: edho unodih. apostata. faruuazzan. refuga. is simmilar to Latin with a score of 0.031643.*

The next three highest scoring language references are:

   RomanschLadin        (score 0.025631)
   Hungarian            (score 0.024498)
   Italian              (score 0.020903)

how look: http://complingone.georgetown.edu/~langid/acq_info.html

--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nasz (talk • contribs) .

By the way, a translation of those words into modern Bavarian would be: samftmoati (sãmftmiati), faterlih (fåtalich), edho unodih (epa unedich), faruuazzan (fawassan = to water smth. down, to adulterate). Interesting, how much similarities there are throughout the centuries, isn' it. --El bes (talk) 16:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Input requested

Please see Category talk:Earliest known manuscripts by language. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Oldest Bavarian book

Actually the language of the 8th century's Abrogans-Dictionary is Old Bavarian. This is the language the original version was written in, givin a translation of over 3.600 latin words into the Bavarian language of those days. The only fully conserved copy is the Abrogans from Sankt Gallen, which is modified into a Latin-Old Alemannic dictionary, although Alemannic and Bavarian were not as seperated from each other as they are today. Nevertheless there are fragments of the original Bavarian language document conserved, which are now in the French State Library in Paris (Paris, Bibliotheque National, cod. lat. 7640, f. 124r-132v).

Of course, historic germanic linguists tend to sum up Old Bavarian and Old Alemannic along with other historic local germanic variants into the "Old High German" supergroup, because both of these idioms already have the Old High German consonant shift. But still the actual vernacular could be mentioned.

It is also interesting, that of the 3.600 entries of the Abrogans-dictionary, 700 still remain untranslatable or have not been deciphered so far. A lot of them being hapax legomenon in Old High German, hence they were not used in Frankish texts. --El bes (talk) 16:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Misleading Manuscript Information

The article here is rather incomplete, and seems in need of quite a few additions. In particular, however, the claim that only one copy survives seems to contradict most opinions. Certainly only one complete copy is still extant - SGall 911, but there are two other more fragmentary manuscripts which are usually considered part of the family. The Paris Manuscript (Cod.lat 7640) is often considered the best manuscript because it retains the assumed original form. Thereto we can also add the Reichenau manuscript (CXI in the Karlsruher Landesbibliothek). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkitype (talk • contribs) 17:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abrogans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050325000445/http://www.cis.uni-muenchen.de:80/cgi-bin/ahdeutsch/stelle.pl?quelle=Abrogans to http://www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/cgi-bin/ahdeutsch/stelle.pl?quelle=Abrogans

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)