Talk:Abgar IX

Latest comment: 11 years ago by BALawrence in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

And here as well as in Abgar VIII article. The reverter from anonymous IP seems to be just stalking my edits and reverting sourced without explanation or discussion. Atabek (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC) i replied, please provide neutral and balanced discussion for articles. hope to work with you on topics and reach cunsensys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article seems to be about the same person as the article on Abgar VIII. You will see in the article on Abgar VIII that there has been confusion about the proper number of this Abgar. I'm pretty sure VIII is currently favored over IX among scholars. See, for example, Segal's Edessa, the Blessed City. BALawrence (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply