This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The script I use is marking this as a "generally unreliable source". I couldn't find it at WP:RSP or WP:RSN but some caution may be advised in its use. Elizium23 (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Crunchbase is an explicitly deprecated source. I've removed them from the article. If we expect this to get to mainspace and survive deletion, we'll need solid actual RS. Elizium23 (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I think that a live website is going to require some explanation in the article for how they weren't actually deplatformed for long -- did they move their DNS to another one of the dozens of providers? Elizium23 (talk) 01:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
According to some sources I'm not using in the draft, they ran as www.ar15-backup.com temporarily. Both ar15.com and ar15-backup.com are registered by Epik at this moment. I found conflicting sources on whether their actual web hosting was affected, or just the DNS record, so I left that out. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Well. Take this as just the OR it is, but ar15.com's web hosting is done by Amazon AWS which as we know has deplatformed before, but in this case, absent a statement or announcement of such, there is no reason to believe that their hosting has been, as yet, disrupted. Elizium23 (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This looks viable to me and I plan to move it to AR15.com after the RFUP goes through. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Uh... it's got some sources. I guarantee it won't survive AFD. I would personally bring it there if no-one else did. I simply don't feel this passes GNG. Elizium23 (talk) 02:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
