Talk:AFS Intercultural Programs

American Field Service

I guess it makes sense to seperat the historical AFS - American Field Service article from the AFS Intercultural Pograms Article. Or what do you think? Thomas Österheld (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Returnees

Should there be a page with stories of returnee AFS students? With tips and things for future students? Lovingnews1989 10:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

great idea, also a section for returnees to update packing list and advice for their specific country and program! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.191.33.137 (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

NO, this is not a good idea: Wikepedia is not a social media site. 24.246.23.7 (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Brazil and AFS

This site: [Cambio] is in Portuguese and talks about AFS and others services alike.Agre22 (talk) 14:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Too Long tag

There is literally only one sentence about activities during WW2, but huge lists of references, former exchange student and external links.

1) It's nice to have much source material to reference but with all those references one would think the ww2 section could be expanded. You can't really have too many (reliable) sources, but the bibliography is very long compared to the length of the the article and there are more references in the bibliography than there are inline citations.

2) The list of 'notable people' who went on exchanges or were involved is,imo, too long. I removed any entries that didn't have a wikipedia page of their own but that wasn't much. If consensus is that these list have some encyclopedic value they could be moved to their own article (e.g. List of former AFS ppl). Their participation in AFS can also be noted on their own bio articles so if the lists are removed the information wouldn't be lost, just relocated.

3) The list of links is so long because there's a link for each regional variation of the organization's website, I didn't count them but probably ~50 or more. In my opinion, this detracts from the encyclopedic intention of the article and makes the article seem like half of it is a website directory. Same if the Google article included a links to all their 100s of domains, although Google happens to be a very special case and there is a special article listing all domains registered to google.

24.246.23.7 (talk) 19:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on AFS Intercultural Programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927072335/http://www.afs.org/AFSI/content/page.php?uid=83 to http://www.afs.org/AFSI/content/page.php?uid=83
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922060553/http://www.afs.org/afs_or/view/about_us to http://www.afs.org/afs_or/view/about_us
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230053304/http://www.afs.org.in/ to http://www.afs.org.in/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225123328/http://www.afsslovakia.sk/ to http://www.afsslovakia.sk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722002655/http://www.afs-tunisia.org.tn/ to http://www.afs-tunisia.org.tn/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221054302/http://www.tkvafs.org/ to http://www.tkvafs.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)