Talk:4711

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2001:4DD7:6A64:0:B4F4:3D33:4E26:CDE1 in topic Rocky Horror

Johann Maria Farina edit

that Johann Maria Farina created 4711 is just a myth and there are no sources. the german wiki says that the myth goes like this: "some say that Wilhelm Mülhens got the recipe in the year 1792 from Franz Maria Carl Gereon Farina, a monk, as a present at his wedding. but that we only know that Wilhelm Mülhens lived in cologne since 1797 and that he started making 'cologne water' since 1799." so why does the english wikipedia say it's a fact and gives credit to Farina. shouldn't we take myths with a grain of salt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.254.22.162 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

the name of S-4711 In Zamyatin's We edit

Just a note. In Zamyatin's We, One of the characters is named S-4711... Some say it's an allusion to the cologne. Care to verify? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.104.60.87 (talkcontribs) 02:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article seems to be saying that there is. I have added a note to the article. --Jtir 14:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
JSTOR: Three Russian Writers and the Irrational: Zamyatin, Pil ...
Three Russian Writers and the Irrational: Zamyatin, Pil'nyak, and Bulgakov ...
Zamiatin borrowed the number for S- from 4711 Eau de Co- logne to illustrate ...

history of 4711 edit

1792 - the birth of an international brand

In 1792 a Carthusian monk presented the newly-married Mulhens couple a seemingly modest wedding present. But this gift affected their future like no other; as it contained: The secret formula for an "aqua mirabilis", an invigorating medicinal "miracle water" later called "Eau de Cologne". Wilhelm Mulhens quickly recognised the value of this formula and soon after started to build a small factory in the street "Glockengasse" in Cologne.

In 1794, during the period of French occupation in Cologne, the French commander ordered consecutive numbering for all houses. The Mulhens building on "Glockengasse", where "Eau de Cologne" was produced, received the housenumber 4711. In 1875 this number became the registered trademark for the international brand 4711 ORIGINAL EAU DE COLOGNE.

4711 Eau de Cologne. Citrus with traces of rosemary and lavender, a spicy etheral scent for both men and women. Considered a unisex cologne.

_______________________________________________


The above text is historical wrong. The story with the monk was invented after 1945. 213.168.95.158 10:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rocky Horror edit

4711 is also the tattoo that can be seen on Dr. Frank N. Furter's leg in Rocky Horror picture show. Just thought I would add that to the discussion :) --TheReverendDoom 17:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is the time travel short story 'Wikihistory' popular enough to mention its IATT Bulletin 1147? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:6A64:0:B4F4:3D33:4E26:CDE1 (talk) 03:35, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

use of "4711" by software engineers edit

[Copied from User talk:Neelvk]. --Jtir 21:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, do you have a verifiable source that describes the use of "4711" by software engineers? --Jtir 08:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, when I was working in Frankfurt, Germany as a software engineer in 1992 and 1993, I saw many instances of such usage. When I asked around, I was told that this was very common behavior, akin to using 69 or 105 (69 in octal) in US. I don't know if this qualifies as verifiable source...
Neelvk 00:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the additional background. A verifiable source is one that can be cited in the article to allow another editor to verify the text of the article. Using google.com and books.google.com, I have found several examples of the use of "4711" in a SW context, including the first one, which references the perfume. It seems to be used in the same way that "foo" and "bar" are used. --Jtir 22:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:4711c.jpg edit

 

Image:4711c.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

4-7-11 edit

The pronunciation was changed some time ago by an un-named contributor. I can see no evidence for this change, in fact all the searches seem to confirm the four-seven-eleven version, in fact, and I understand that this is original research, all the TV and cinema advertisements of the 60s and 70s use this, as do the current owners of the brand. On further research, Irish and Australian marketing seems to have used the same pronunciation. I have reverted the un-named edit to reflect this.Splodgeness (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have heard only the pronunciation four-seven-eleven in British English. Forty-seven eleven appears to be a literal translation of the German. Edwin Greenwood (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Vandalism removed

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


47114711 (brand) – Why 36.83.125.206 (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you are asking why that implies that you are not supporting the move. Unless I am missing something this should be closed unless you or someone else offers a rational.--70.49.82.207 (talk) 04:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose move. There's nothing to disambiguate from, so why add our own disambiguation to the title? bobrayner (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose The only other thing I can conceivably think of that can go under that title is the year but that is almost 2700 years away so it's a non issue.--70.49.82.207 (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4711. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

French troops and house numbering edit

I am unable to understand the connection between the presence of French troops and the need for house numbering. Please explain. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:B5A1:6530:AD6A:107D (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply