Talk:30 West 56th Street/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • Short description goes at the top.
  • Add alt text to every image being used.
  • Add a hyphen between "Japanese style".
  • "There are three segmental-arched dormers protruding" → "Three segmental-arched dormers are protruding"
  • "has limestone quoins" → "have limestone quoins"
  • "a private library with designed" - is "with" necessary?
  • "office of Italian designer" - is a "the" missing before Italian?
  • "and in Republican Party" → "and Republican Party"
  • "association opened their" → "association opened its"
  • Wikilink The New York Times and Craig Claiborne.

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks, I've done all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply