This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, been reading through this page trying to get information on the regiment. I noticed the two Official Records citations (footnotes 2 & 3) refer to Volume 60 & 66...which do not exist. The O.R.s are divided into four series. Series 1 is the longest and only goes up to Volume 53. I Checked to see if this was just extending into Series 2 (discussing matters regarding POWs), and so I jump to Volume 7 of Series 2 to verify footnote 2. However, the page number had no information pertaining to the 26th Alabama, especially not in the context of the text the footnote is justifying.
I presume this is just a screwup by the person who made the citations. That happens a lot, and I've seen errors like that in publications often. If the original editor who inserted the footnotes can clarify the matter, I would appreciate it.
--ThoughtfulPug (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
