Talk:2019 Cricket World Cup
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
| This is the talk page for discussing 2019 Cricket World Cup and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | 2019 Cricket World Cup has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |  |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Editing or bullying? edit
Why the hell was my edit reverted despite it being completely true and relevant? I've seen that many wiki editors edit articles as per their whim. The reasons given by some editors and completely against the reasons given by other editors, and most of them are silly anyway. These editors are pure bullshit. Anubhab030119 (talk) 10:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- It seems to be true, but not entirely relevant. This is meant to be a summary of the tournament, not a ball-by-ball commentary. You may think it relevant, but others less so. Spike 'em (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- And a single revert hardly counts as bullying. Spike 'em (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have re-reverted your change until this discussion comes to a conclusion, as per WP:BRD. I don't think it is worthy of mention. Spike 'em (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- By your logic, many of the statements in this article can be considered as ball-by-ball commentary then. And what's the harm in adding a few details to the games? Some games have a few details, while others don't. It should be one way or the other all the way. Anubhab030119 (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have re-reverted your change until this discussion comes to a conclusion, as per WP:BRD. I don't think it is worthy of mention. Spike 'em (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)