Talk:2014 Al-Safira offensive

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Templar Dagger in topic Territorial Changes

The result edit

I would suggest that "defensive" term should be added to Syrian Army victory. So, it should look like: "Syrian Army defensive victory". There are no strategic gains for the rebels, neither the army.

I agree, it should be described either as a defensive victory or as a stalemate. Terrortank (talk) 08:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think a stalemate would imply no real changes, whilst using "Syrian Army defensive victory" would imply a victory by the Syrian Army, but not as an offensive taking rebel-controlled territory, only in defense. Templar Dagger (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Territorial Changes edit

I think that another bullet point should be added to specify that there were no territorial changes once all was said and done, maybe something such as:

  • Seven villages near the Defense Factories are taken and retaken
  • No territorial differences between October 8 and October 12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Templar Dagger (talkcontribs) 16:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 Al-Safira offensive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply