Talk:2014–15 South Pacific cyclone season

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

June edit

  • 90P.INVEST - Tropical Disturbance 17F
Best status from NRL: 20 kts 1007 mb
Best status from RSMC: 1006 hPa
90P.INVEST first appeared 2015-04-25, 0400z @ 5.0°S 163.0°E
LOW from ABPW10 2015-06-28, 0600z @ 5.4°S 162.2°E
Tropical Disturbance 17F from RSMC Nadi 2015-06-28, 0300z @ 4.5°S 163.3°E
MEDIUM from ABPW10 2015-06-28, 1700z @ 4.1°S 163.2°E
Tropical Depression 17F from RSMC Nadi 2015-06-29, 2100z @ 4.3°S 160.5°E
TCFA from WTPS21 2015-06-30, 0200z @ 4.2S 160.8E
Crossed to Australian AoR 2015-06-30, 1200z, where it is continued as part of the 2015/6 season

RSMC Nadi Tropical Disturbance Summary

2015-06-28, 0300z // 0900z // 2100z
2015-06-29, 0900z // 2100z
2015-06-30, 0900z (Final)

Do not refer to expected winds from Fiji marine weather bulletin edit

This bulletin describes expected gale-force winds (at least 35), so they are not currently gale-force. Moreover, area of gales means the expected gale-force area, so it does not mean the system has reached gale-force. Wikipedia should follow the officially specific winds from Fiji. -- Meow 06:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Anyone found 07F? edit

Guys, just wondering why we haven't found 07F, especially anonymous users, users and admins. I have not found a warning on any agency about it. Although I have found a clue: @Keith Edkins: updated the season track map and there is an unknown track. I don't know if it is 07F or not. Does anyone know and want to contribute? Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, the additional tack on the seasonal map was a fiddle whose purpose I had forgotten and incorrectly left on the uploaded version. (There seems to be a problem with the track generator not drawing any tracks when all the storms are east of the date line, so I added a short dummy track to the west - but forgot to edit it out at the end.) I have removed it. I rechecked all the Nadi bulletins from the relevant period and cannot find any mention of an 07F.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
While it is annoying that we are missing a system, I wouldn't worry to much about it Typhoon2013 since it has happened in the past. As a side Keith do you have any TDS or TWOs for the 24th - thats the only day i can not find any for.Jason Rees (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Jason Rees: Just in case we find any evidence on this system, check this website: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/labs/worldview . I found a circulation just near Niko dissipated from the 24th until the 27th. If unspotted, it's just about northeast of NZ or in the bottom-left side of the page. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
All I got was a couple of Marine Weather Bulletins (FQPS01): 2015-01-24, 0600z // 1800z --Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 13:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tropical Cyclone 24P edit

I have found a mysterious storm numbered '24P' on NRL's tropical cyclone data page. I investigated and found that 24P was actually 23P as an invest, just that they probably numbered it wrongly. I checked the NRL archive data page for the track file and found a line with designation 23P but spelt 'TWENTYFOUR' instead. On weather forum Storm2k.org someone posted a JTWC archived advisory on the storm, but that particular advisory was not found on NRL's index of JTWC advisories. I am wondering whether this is a mere error or it was a separate storm altogether.Damien4794 (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have conferred with various users of Facebook including a moderator on the Storm 2k forum on this and we all think its just an error.Jason Rees (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ola edit

The section says the system moved to the east-northeast, however that is not clear, considering the track map. If so, this movement must have been very short. All over all the system was heading nearly due south most of its existence. Could this be verified, please? Furthermore, it is not clear when weaking (and presumedly et. transition) began. --Matthiasb (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why are you looking at the track map from the JTWC rather than the reference cited from RSMC Nadi which clearly says "DEPRESSION MOVING EAST NORTHEAST". I dont think the section is up to par though and would advise you to be bold and expand it using the refs above.Jason Rees (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 28 external links on 2014–15 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply