Talk:2010 European Union bank stress test

By-bank results

The by-bank results were released as scans(!) rather than machine-readable spreadsheet data. This should be made into a table in this article. I have made a start. Would someone like to take over please? – Kaihsu (talk) 22:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I am putting the bank names in; then I will stop and let someone else take over. Or, we could ask for a spreadsheet from the British Financial Services Authority under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to see if they have one. – Kaihsu (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Results

I have read in the newspapers that the bank with the best resistence (Tier 1 in the worst scenary) is Banca March (19.0), followed by OTP, Bank Polski and BBK (14.1). Hamiltha (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Criteria for failure

Seems that all the banks that did not pass the test had an adverse% of less than 6.4% and a shock% less than 6.0%. Does anybody know the formal criteria for failure? Victor Victoria (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Criticism

Well the stress test has been criticized on various grounds. Mainly for not including a stress test of sovereign debt held at banking books. And this critical remarks shall be mentioned there, either in a separate section or in the main text. I linked the OECD paper that discusses these criticisms.

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/57/45820698.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.231.248.92 (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thy and I encourage including a criticism chapter. I am shocked to read the entities that developed the tests and executed the tests - the Committee of European Banking Supervisors - are not deemed trustworthy by some financial groups and analysts s.a. Dr Stavrou [1]. This would mean democracy would fail on an EU wide level and that the majority of the people that represent us are corrupt and incompetent?! I don't understand the criticism why a National Banking Supervisor would be deemed to be too implicated in banks on its territory, that it would cover up the truth about the strenght of the banks. Wouldn't that be like supposing that judges wouldn't condemn certain powerful groups when brought to court? Sounds a bit like conspiracy thinking. If we cannot even trust in separation of powers, then the democratic model doesn't work. Also when the criticism comes from rating agencies that criticise/ridiculize the National and EU Banking supervisers and the public supervision of the testing and develpoment of the tests via our democratically elected politicians, the criticism is rather cynical as the rating agencies formula's to rank e.g. banks and national economies and the effects they have caused are under strong critisation themselves and as such ill placed to formulate criticism.--SvenAERTS (talk) 09:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 results

Here: http://stress-test.eba.europa.eu/ http://stress-test.eba.europa.eu/pdf/EBA_ST_2011_Summary_Report_v6.pdf – Kaihsu (talk) 18:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

propose delete. Moved to 2010 and 2012 European Union banks stress test pages.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjlabs (talk • contribs) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2010 European Union bank stress test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/documents/Listofbanks.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/documents/CEBSPressRelease.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/documents/JointPressRelease.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/documents/Summaryreport.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111028132743/http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/results.htm to http://stress-test.c-ebs.org/results.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)