Talk:2010–11 South Pacific cyclone season

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Old templates?? edit

Why was the old Season effects template removed?? --Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

There was a lot of problems including original research and referencing missing with the old table which is why it was overhauled and replaced with its current form.Jason Rees (talk) 12:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seasonal summary? edit

What happened? It looks strange now. Is it not in it's correct format? Rye998 (talk) 01:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It reckons that a tropical disturbance formed on 31/12/2011 which is beyond the dates of the article and hasnt accorded yet. I will fix it in a sec.Jason Rees (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vania Article edit

I created an Article for severe tropical cyclone Vania, thinking that it would become a deadly cyclone and would have tons of information to store. But the system gradually weakened and didn't cause much damage. So as of now, the article is just a copy of the information on this article. I quickly chose to redirect the article to the Vania section in this article. Any objections? --Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Remember, never copy the season article- even if the storm is intense- create a sandbow and expabd it. Also, do not cite images! Ever! — Iune(talk) 16:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes i have an objection to it being merged as we do have tons of information on it and i will be working on it over the coming days.Jason Rees (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay, and there is a lot of confusion about 06F and 07F right now! --Anirudh Emani (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Whats confusing about 06/07F? 07F got kicked to wellington last night who are currently monitoring it as a subtropical low to the north of NZ. 06F is Wilma.Jason Rees (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the late reply, i was confused when i was reading the page at that time, because both were similar(on that day). And then one dissipated while the other became the strongest possible storm in the season! --Anirudh Emani (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just remember when a system crosses 25S, Nadi kicks it too Wellington, which is what caused your confusion.Jason Rees (talk) 05:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

STC Vania strength edit

Vania is listed as equivalent to a Tropical Storm on the SSHS, and shown as such on the track maps in the Vania section and for the season map. However the infobox lists the intensity as 120 km/h. This means it is actually equivalent to a Cat 1 Hurricane on the SSHS, especially considering that 10-minute sustained winds are 14% lower than the 1-minute readings used by the SSHS Maximum_sustained_wind. Adding 14% to convert places it firmly in the middle of the Cat 1 range. So should the graphics and the infobox be changed, or is the stated intensity too high?FrankDynan (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

As I remember the Joint Typhoon Warning never warned that it was a hurricane, though Fiji Meteorological Service did. - グリフオーザー (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Whilst i know RSMC Nadi's intensity is equivalent to a Cat 1 TC on the SSHS, we take our peak 1-min winds from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center, who reckoned it was just a tropical storm on the SSHS with a peak intensity of 60kts.Jason Rees (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deaths from Vania edit

I've removed the fatalities previously listed from Vania as the sources citing them were not backed up by other sources. The three fatalities in Fiji are almost certainly fabricated as every other media source states no fatalities from the flooding. As for the death in Lifou, it was a heart attack triggered by the Earthquake, not from Vania. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 74 external links on 2010–11 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply