Talk:2009 Kokang incident

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Myanmar	Yunnan

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 27, 2011, August 27, 2016, August 27, 2019, and August 27, 2022.

Myanmar Low‑importance

2009 Kokang incident is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Name change edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

Is it proper to have changed the name of this incident to "Kokang rebellion"? In everything I have read so far, there is not really any mention of what the rebel armies' motivations might be, and calling it a "rebellion" makes it appear that there is some political motivation (such as independence) rather than just an explosion of tensions at the right moment. (Also, I should note that I took the name "Kokang incident" precisely from the name used in the pre-existing zh-wiki article, zh:果敢八八事件, lit. "Kokang 8 August incident"; so far no English-language sources I've seen have given this a name.) Likewise, I think "vying for control of the region", added in this edit, is too much—in the lede, we don't need to put words in anyone's mouth to say why we think they are fighting, we can just report that the fighting has happened. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 05:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know what you mean, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to classify the conflict as a sub-regional combat--that is, a rebellion which is not expected to escalate into civil war anytime soon. As for motivations, there's an article in the Bangkok Post (not yet available online) which suggests the group has already set up some form of officer corps. Ottre 05:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

this is not a rebellion, this is a crackdown "The violence erupted after government troops moved into the enclave, seeking to dislodge local rulers and their militia who have long controlled this mountainous terrain next to China."[1] I'm putting a POV tag--TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

There are a lot of different explanations for how the violence happened. What is in the article now is my best attempt so far to construct a logical narrative of events, based on all the sources I have read. As far as I can tell, the government troops moved in without violence breaking out (they were apparently aided by a "mutiny" within the ranks of the Kokang army), and after that Kokang forces started attacking government army and police troops in the mountains around the city. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 21:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

(out) Just for the record... User:Qrfqr also said he thinks 'incident' is better [2]. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Similar articles have the names fighting, clashes and conflict which are more descriptive and also neutral--TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Are you saying those names are better than "rebellion", or better than "incident"? I agree that 'rebellion' is a poor choice; I like 'incident', though. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

incident is not so good either, i think this is a follow up to the situation as it was. not the only one open to myanmar, but not the least predictable , you may want to call it an offenisve against the separatist groups and their militia, as sri lanka did for a long time, myanmar itself doubtlessly considers it that 'pacification'.24.132.171.225 (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Kokang incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090923044138/http://ca.news.yahoo.com:80/s/afp/090830/world/myanmar_china_unrest_ethnic_media to http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/090830/world/myanmar_china_unrest_ethnic_media

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Kokang incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091020173201/http://www.kachinnews.com:80/index.php/news/1062-burmese-troops-and-kokang-soldiers-clash.html to http://www.kachinnews.com/index.php/news/1062-burmese-troops-and-kokang-soldiers-clash.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2009 Kokang incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2009 Kokang incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2695%3Akokang-capital-falls-not-shoot-first-policy-under-fire&catid=86%3Awar&Itemid=284
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irrawaddy.org/highlight.php?art_id=16525
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2678%3Ajuntas-ploy-push-kokang-to-shoot-first&catid=86%3Awar&Itemid=284
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2692%3Atension-sparks-people-to-flee-into-china&catid=86%3Awar&Itemid=284
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=16662
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090830013448/http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=16658 to http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=16658
Corrected formatting/usage for http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-08-29/china/28159665_1_myanmar-military-junta-myanmar-government-myanmarese
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4452%3Akokang-wants-to-join-ceasefire-talks&catid=85%3Apolitics&Itemid=266

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009 Kokang incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic