Talk:2009 Australian Open

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

> The coolest Australian Open was in 1986, when the maximum temperature averaged just 22.5 degrees Celsius, 3.5 degrees below normal.[5][6]

There was no Australian open in 1986, please correct.

Proposed new structure edit

Almost all tournament articles to date employ day-by-day structure. Though this structure is informative while tournament is in progress, it suffers from several problems including WP:SUMMARY and WP:LENGTH once details on all the days are expanded and detailed. There is also unnecessary details on matches held every day in the tournament which, albeit significant in terms of all the matches held that day, are not significant in terms of perspective of whole tournament. In light of these issues I am proposing a new structure to be applied at the end of the tournament wherein the article presents a more systematic and concise view of the tournament and is drives away the monotonous approach seen in case of day-by day summaries. I believe that this new structure would also help in promoting article to GA/FA status.

A significant part of this structure relies on expansion of sub-articles as well. Information on list of seeds, individual seeds departure/defeat should be included only in these sub-articles and not the main article. The main article, to the maximum extent possible, should be free from statistics or other such details.

I'd like to hear thoughts on this proposed change. LeaveSleaves 16:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree with this new structure, and think it should be used for all tournaments especially the Grand Slams, where it seems like it can do the most good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alonsornunez (talkcontribs) 19:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Na Li? edit

Shouldn't it be "Li Na"? We don't call Yao Ming "Ming Yao". –Howard the Duck 08:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Serena Williams edit

It should be noted that Serena Williams did not "retain" her title, as the article says. She was not the defending women's singles champion. Last year's champion was Maria Sharapova. Serena was the champion in 2003, 2005, and 2007. This sentence should be edited to reflect this. Possible choices could be "regained" or "recaptured". "Retain" implies that she kept her title from last year, which is not the case. Thank you! Raffy85 (talk) 10:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article needs to be rewritten to be more encyclopedic edit

There is way too much uncited and unencyclopedic commentary, e.g., "breezed" through his match. Tennis expert (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Matches on Arenas! edit

Template to Use! edit

Day # (# January) edit

  • Seeds out:
    • Men's Singles:
    • Women's Singles:
    • Men’s Doubles:
    • Women’s Doubles:
    • Mixed Doubles:

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 33 external links on 2009 Australian Open. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply