Talk:1st Battalion, 68th Armor Regiment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st Battalion, 68th Armor Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I am still kinda of new at this so forgive me for the formating errors as I try to learn how to do all this stuff. Long story short I had made the 1st BN, 68th AR page and then kinda of dropped out of the scene. Someone came along and redirected it to the 68th ar regiment page. So basically it would be like if there was a page on Mustang, but someone redircted it to the Ford page. Chmg3 (talk) 04:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
What is it? edit
I came to the article page when my eye was caught by the title - 1st Battalion, 68th Armor. '68th Armor' what ?? Does this unit formally call itself '1st Battalion 68th Armor'? I very much doubt it.
Admittedly I did not read the full article, but that is not the point; I only found that the article concerned a regiment when I came to this page and read Chmg3's comments.(see above) Can the title here and at any other US Army unit articles not be made more clear? e.g. 1st Battalion, 68th Armored Regiment
RASAM (talk) 14:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Total Wiki-newbie, posting on 9 Sep 10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.214.128.6 (talk) 21:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Sorry, I know I'm doing this wrong - but while 1-68 is currently deployed, they're not where you're saying they are.