Talk:1997 constitution of Thailand

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1997 constitution of Thailand article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Thailand High‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

1997 constitution of Thailand was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 7, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
December 13, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Not in search index (as of 5 Nov 2006) edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has not been included in the search index as of 5 Nov 2006. Searching for "1997 Constitution of Thailand" will not how this article. Patiwat 20:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Auto WP:PR (5 Nov 2006) edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
~~Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word 'The'. For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.~~
~~There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.~~ For example,
- allege
- ~~might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).~~^[1]
Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 11 additive terms, a bit too much.
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “~~All~~ pigs are pink, so we thought of ~~a number of~~ ways to turn them green.”
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Patiwat 23:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

^ See footnote

GA review edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As of [1] (the current article during review), here is my assessment of this article per WP:WIAGA:

(criterion 1.a) → prose needs improvements. Try to ask other copyeditors who do not know about the subject.
(criterion 1.b) → lead section needs improvements:
- The lead section is still short and does not yet summarizing the article.
- The last sentence of the first paragraph in the lead is a bit odd to mention further successive replacement of the constitution. The 2006 constitution does not directly related to the subject, as the 1997 was replaced by 1991 constitution.
(criterion 1.c) → please read again about embedded list. The article has two heavy lists: the constitution sections and innovations. You need to convert the list into textual writing.

Conclusion: GA is failed at the moment. When all the above issues are resolved, the article can be resubmitted again. If you feel disagree about the reviews above, then you may submit this article to the WP:GA/R. — Indon (reply) — 01:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply