Talk:'74 Jailbreak

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

this should be considerately expanded, even though it's only an ep it's part of several album rerelease series and priced as such — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.123.106 (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:'74 Jailbreak/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  N At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel
  • Technical personnel list is a little thin: just the producers.
  •  N Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
  •  Y A casual reader should learn something about the album

B-class:

  •  N All the C-class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
  • Phrase Australian version of repeated too many times in second paragraph. Australian, United States, Canada and Japan don't need wikilinks: they're commonly understood terms.
  •  N No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"
Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on '74 Jailbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply