Sus law

In England and Wales, the sus law (from "suspected person"[1]) was a stop and search law that permitted a police officer to stop, search and potentially arrest people on suspicion of them being in breach of section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824. According to a 2018 study in the British Journal of Criminology, stop and search had a marginal impact on crime in the UK.[2]

1824 legislationEdit

The power to act on suspicion was found in part of section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824, which provided that:

every suspected person or reputed thief, frequenting any river, canal, or navigable stream, dock, or basin, or any quay, wharf, or warehouse near or adjoining thereto, or any street, highway, or avenue leading thereto, or any place of public resort, or any avenue leading thereto, or any street, or any highway or any place adjacent to a street or highway; with intent to commit an arrestable offence

— section 4, Vagrancy Act 1824

"[S]hall be deemed a rogue and vagabond" and would be guilty of an offence, and be liable to be imprisoned for up to three months. This effectively permitted the police to stop and search, and even arrest, anyone found in a public place if they suspected that they intended to commit an offence.[3]

In order to bring a prosecution under the act, the police had to prove that the defendant had committed two acts:[4]

  • the first, that established them as a "suspected person" (by acting suspiciously), and
  • the second, that provided intent to commit an arrestable offence.

Two witnesses were required to substantiate the charge, which were usually two police officers patrolling together.[4]

1970s and 1980sEdit

The law caused much discontent among certain sections of the population, particularly black and ethnic minorities, against whom the law was particularly targeted by the police—see racial profiling.[4] The sus law had attracted considerable controversy prior to the early 1980s race riots (in St Pauls, Bristol, in 1980, and in Brixton, London; Toxteth, Liverpool; Handsworth, Birmingham; and Chapeltown, Leeds in 1981).

This led to campaigns against the law including the "Scrap Sus" campaign led by Mavis Best[5] and Paul Boateng.[6]

When questioned on the topic in 1980, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir David McNee stated that the reason for its disproportionate use on black people was because they were "over-represented in offences of robbery and other violent theft".[7]

In 1980, the House of Commons' Sub-Committee on Race Relations and Immigration began hearings into the law. In the case of the race riots, the alleged abusive use of the sus law was believed to be a contributory factor to those events.[3] The sus law was repealed on 27 August 1981, on the advice of the 1979 Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure,[citation needed] when the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 received Royal Assent.[8]

2007 legislationEdit

Subsequent British legislation that makes provision for the police to act on the basis of suspicion alone has been denounced as "another sus law" by opponents of proposals to grant increased "stop and question" powers to police officers in England and Wales.[9] Scottish law permits detention without arrest for up to six hours, using powers under the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980.

Mr Hain said he wanted to see the details of the policy before making any judgement. But he told BBC1’s Sunday AM: “We cannot have a reincarnation of the old ‘sus’ laws under which mostly black people, ethnic minorities, were literally stopped on sight and that created a really bad atmosphere and an erosion of civil liberties.”[10][11]

In January 2008 David Cameron, at the time Conservative leader of the opposition, announced that he would, if elected, seek to return similar powers to the police. Under Conservative proposals, police sergeants would be able to authorise the use of stop and search of pedestrians and vehicles in a specific area for up to six hours—or 48 hours if permission is granted by a senior officer. Gordon Brown, then Labour prime minister, announced in response that he would seek to remove the lengthy forms that are currently required for 'stop and searches'.[12]

In languageEdit

The abbreviation "sus" or "suss" either as a noun or verb became common in parts of the country. The terms moved from meanings based on the original "suspicion", as in "that's rather suss" to meaning "to find out" as in "you have been sussed!"

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ "sus | suss, n." Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  2. ^ Tiratelli, Matteo; Quinton, Paul; Bradford, Ben (13 August 2018). "Does Stop and Search Deter Crime? Evidence From Ten Years of London-wide Data". The British Journal of Criminology. 58 (5): 1212–1231. doi:10.1093/bjc/azx085. ISSN 0007-0955.
  3. ^ a b "The legacy of the Brixton riots". BBC News. 5 April 2006. Retrieved 6 June 2007.
  4. ^ a b c Terrill, Richard J (Summer 1989). "Margaret Thatcher's Law and Order Agenda". The American Journal of Comparative Law. 37 (3): 429–456. doi:10.2307/840088. JSTOR 840088.
  5. ^ Media Diversified https://mediadiversified.org/mavisbest-2/
  6. ^ BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/482565.stm
  7. ^ https://www.runnymedetrust.org/histories/race-equality/45/runnymede-reports-on-use-of-sus-law.html
  8. ^ section 8, Criminal Attempts Act 1981, by section 11 (commencement), one month after date of assent
  9. ^ "Concerns voiced over new terror powers". The Times. London. 27 May 2007. Retrieved 6 June 2007.
  10. ^ "Reaction to 'stop and question' plans". BBC News. 27 May 2007. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
  11. ^ "Concern over new anti-terror laws". Metro. 27 May 2007. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
  12. ^ "Push for new stop and search laws". BBC News. 30 January 2008. Retrieved 24 May 2010.